Posted on

adidas Crazy Explosive 2017 PK Performance Review

Crazy explosive 2017 pk is  the most top team shoes of Adidas , it said that the season’s top basketball shoes is not an exaggeration,The original adidas Crazy Explosive turned heads for looking more like a wrestling boot than a basketball silhouette fit for the rigors of the NBA when it was first leaked a year or so ago. How times have changed.as the adidas Crazy Explosive 17 features Forged Primeknit technology for the first time ever. It’s created from a single piece designed with particular key target areas reinforced for more stability, creating a dynamic, lightweight comfort like no other.

For the material : A sock-like ankle makes this pair easier than ever to slip into while full-length Boost .I was shock about  its cool socks design, it changed the shape of the previous generation of hiking shoes.Then I was  concern that it would not be very great for supportive. After all. Look at the ancestor hyperdunk 2016 fk. Although there is a feeling of a boost , the weak support is indeed  by people .But when I was playing a game, my concerns disappeared, Crazy Explosive 2017 PK’s  stability was really good.Compared with the previous generation, it was more anti-rollover, and the TPU extended to the side, which the  function is almost, this is when you change direction to be very cool.

Compared with the previous generation, the changes to the uppers of these shoes were progressive, which used the Forged Primeknit technology, enhanced the supportability and wraparound, and the uppers did not have much deformation when they changed direction. But because of this change, the comfort of the upper has been decreased. After all, the previous generation’s upper is really comfortable . This should be the most comfortable upper for me.  Crazy Explosive 2017 PK is particularly hard, I feel that my toe will be more pressure .  But everything was for the game , the performance is nice , this one can get so many points is great. I hope ce 2018 can also enhance the comfort of the forefoot upper while maintaining supportability.

 

For the cushioning : In fact, there is nothing to say about cushioning. The sole is almost the same as the previous generation. It was changed for the shoe cage. The cushioning of boost really amazing , it was still awesome for the Adidas tech . I have done a test with take a full-shoulder lunar sneakers,and the  Crazy Explosive 2017 PK , jumped downed the ground should be 20 to 30 centimeters, then  I feel a directly  feeling with the back of bouncet,Crazy Explosive 2017 PK can be felt a strong sense of shock, so if you like the feeling of bounce ,maybe that is the best choice for you.

Crazy Explosive 2017 PK  will be great for the court feeling , compare with the  kd10，lbj15. Of course, I’m not saying that the foot feels bad, and Crazy Explosive 2017 PK  is one of the best 4 pairs of boosts I’ve experienced for recent year. At present, all of Adidas shoes are  very soft.But like Rose 7, crazylight 2016 as will be more harder ,  that is for the quickly for start,and I like these  4 pairs of boost, crazylight  2016, crazylight  2017, crazylight low Rose 8, the forefoot is doing very well , With the boost feeling and more bounce ,  unlike the kd9 kind of one foot in the end of the bomb. The most important point is that this does not affect the launch. I think this is a great thing. I have found a balance point, not an extreme soft, but I can give him moderate feedback.

For the traction,the traction just so so,Of course, if you really want to play in outside, but you still want to  experience the feeling of  boost, I would recommend Rose 8, although the material just so so,  all aspects are very excellent, because of the Boost is just as good as Crazy Explosive 2017 PK . I don’t feel the problem with the card surface. The most important thing is the traction will be worn a lot . Or Crazy Explosive 2017 PK  is also a good choice

but it will be more worn out because of the material , if you often played out side , it will be more worn soon. On the dirty hardwood courts, the traction was cutting through the dust like a hot knife to a stick of butter! I was out there wood grain grippin

Posted on

1997 vs. 2008 vs. 2013 Comparison Air Jordan 13 “He Got Game

AIR JORDAN 13  He Got Game have been a popular colorway as always. seems with the “Panda”. It was  came back in the 2008 which the  23rd anniversary of Jordan’s, it was covered in the CDP suit, though it is just  so so for the selling , but it has been still popular. In 2013, it came back again .it was the most popular in that year .
But why ? What’s the difference? This is one of the most important issues I care about, and it’s also a question I’ve been curious about for this series.So today we will talking about it .

This Air Jordan XIII colorway originally released in 1997 and was actually the only Air Jordan XIII colorway to release that year (all other original colorways dropped in 1998). In the movie, Jake Shuttlesworth (played by Denzel Washington), a prison inmate, gets sent on a mission to convince the convict’s son, a star High School basketball player, to play for the warden’s alma mater in exchange for a shorter sentence. One iconic scene of the film features Jake shopping for a pair of kicks, and without hesitation, he requests the new Air Jordans to which he is presented with the Air Jordan XIII. From then on this colorway adopted the ‘He Got Game

Posted on

Air Jordan 3 Black Cement: Comparison 1994 vs. 2001 vs. 2008 vs. 2011 vs. 2018

The Air Jordan 3 is Michael Jordan’s third signature basketball shoe. And it has been popular in recently year .It released in 1988 in four colorways of white, black, red, and blue. It was the first Air Jordan to feature visible Air, elephant print, and the Jumpman logo

But there are different series , the version of 1994. 2001,2008,2011and 2018

So today we are talking about it .

For the material , they are the same  , the same upper matter and the same shape design and colorway The leather upper is decent enough  and  durability, if  you are looking for the nice leather, it will be good choice .Flexibility of the material itself was actually pretty good and I had no real issues with it.For the colorway ,it is also nice and fit all kinds of style.

For the shape of shoes ,the version of 1998 ,2001 are the same as version 1994. but from the version of 2008 , it is has a little difference  , the shape of shoes will be a little radian，we can see the picture .so if you mind the shape of shoes ,you can choose different version.

 

 

For the fitting , they are the same ,if you are wider footer , you can buy more half size , that is will be better . The areas covered with eyelets were great.When moving at a rapid pace and quickly changing direction, but the forefoot  just work it , it was unable to handle the torque applied to the materials .It is a slight drawback as you could feel your forefoot slip a bit when enough pressure is used.

For the traction , all of version are use the same pattern of rubber traction , texture is abundant throughout and the giant pivot point did not hinder their performance at all. if we have to say there is different , it must be  the logo ” NIKE ” was used the version 1994 and 2001 , and the version of  2008 and 2011 just used 2011.but the version of 2018 , it is still used the logo ” NIKE “, but the color will be more light then the version of 1994 .so if you like the old version of shoes ,maybe it will the best choice .

For the supporting ，all of version are great , it performance well , so the newest version of 2018 is nice too. The arch is sculpted providing you with a better fit and support while flexing the foot. but  rubber heel cup worked, seems it followed the Air Jordan II.  if   you are looking the nice supporting , maybe it is a good choice . some part of supporting is from the material .the fit from the midfoot to heel was substantial enough to where this didn’t hinder performance too much as a whole.but there are a little difference of logo too. the version of 1994 and the version of 2001, they used the AIR logo , but for the version 2008 and 2011, it is used the JUMPAMN  LOGO ,But the version of 2018 ,it is return to the lod version of 1994. so which version will be your choice ?

 

 

For the logo of tongue , the same jumpman logo , but if you look them seriously , you will find the logo have a little difference , I meant the jumpman , their arms  are different. but if you dont mind , just escaped .it is nothing  important , it is just a logo .

For the cushioning  : they are almost the same , the performance is the same , it is nice !!The polyurethane midsoles are far too dense for me and even with an insole swap I was only partially pain-free until a certain point. they work is great. but they are some compression.  If you are young, you won’t have much of an issue but for some of us older players,but for older players who can still run quickly, maybe they need to be able to absorb as much impact as possible so our bodies can endure on-court play.

For toe design , though they are the same , but there is a little difference , you can check from the details as the picture , but for someone, maybe they are not the different. because it is not important .

  There are the details of the tag ,they use the same material ,but the version of 1994 are the same 2001, they are use the AIR  logo. and the 2008 version used the jumpman logo ,but it different the version  of 2011 and 2018 .I have to say it is not important .

For the Ventilation , they are the same nice , While there are perforations, they don’t puncture through the material completely so they are more for looks rather than serve a purpose. This caused the material to soften up while playing  which  trapping heat and moisture inside , ventilation wasn’t as popular back in this era so it’s to be expected.

For the details of inside ,the details showing is the same, but the font is different . the version of 1994 was different .it is seems stitching ,then from the version of 2001, it is just used thermal proceed . so it show the development of nike  for 24 years

The version of 1994   using a similar fine felt lining material,
We can feel a sense of touch, and the filling of thin lining.For the  2001
version with a liner made of cotton knitted material, it  feels very soft, and the filling of the lining is thicker. The version of 2008  followed  a similar material with 2oo1.Then the version of 2011 and 2018 have not a big difference .Cotton knitted material, it  is very soft, we can feel more smooth.

The version of 1994 shoe’s box is known as the most beautiful AlR JORDAN in history.The separation of the upper and lower openings in the form, with the time of the launch of the box.
All AIR JORDAN shoes picture and Jordan’s classic advertisement photo.The central JORDAN WINGS Logo is the primary. 2001version is normal ,it is  a  silver gray Jordan shoe box . The version of 2008 used a combination of CDP suits.The version of  2011 and 2018, in order to reshow the year’s setting,it  used a black box cover and burst with  style of separating boxes .  

The version of 1994 had a carve card with a front pattern and a shoe box
The cover is the same, and  the big picture of AIRJORDAN 3 with black
The reversion of the 2001  is also accompanied by a duplicate card that The front is the 1988 all star Jordan free throw and a simple introduction to the shoes and AJ3. There is no incidental CDP suit in 2008
the version of  2011 reprint version is the first year of reference
Style, with a foldable specification that introduces the AIR JORDAN 3 configuration.
In 2018, just had a square plastic hanging card .

 

Posted on

Air Jordan 1 Performance Review

The Air Jordan 1 Mid 2017 Retro is set to release at select Jordan Brand retailers soon.Jordan Brand released those two shoes as a pack 10 years ago. This means that if you wanted one, you also had to buy the other.For the Air Jordan 1 Mid New Love actually nice , the court feeling is amazing .

Today we are talking about it.

The first game during which this issue popped up was played in the Madison Square Garden on the 18th of October 1984. The colorway was considered rebellious, back in the day because it didn’t match with the players uniform or his team members shoes.  Air Jordan 1 Mid New Love represents Michael Jordan’s love for motorcycle racing. It is made out of leather in a Yellow (Varsity Maize) and Black color scheme. The 2017 version comes with a new feature on the upper.

For the box, it is normal but nothing special.

 

There are the details in the tongue .

Jumpman branding on the tongue, two set of laces (Yellow and Black), and a White midsole and Yellow translucent outsole round out the look of the shoe

For the material :Full leather uppers and a rubber midsole and outsole that follow last version.The main thing is that the type of leather used allows for added strength and durability which can be a nice feature to have.That is not bad . though it add some weight for this material.

For the cushioning : I went over previously and it’s pretty much a no brains,cushion was not good. if you are like the great cushioning , maybe it is not enough for you.

For the traction:Instead of coming with a jeweled Wings branding on the ankle, Jordan Brand opts to give it a more traditional look by replacing it with a stamped/painted on finish

For the supporting :it is also not great…

For ventilation , it is nice for the  perforations featured on the toe as well as a nylon tongue for some ventilation, even if just a little.

 

Overall,Nike didn’t do raffles and neither is this sneaker a limited release. However, they have been playing it smart by stocking the Banned 1‘s in small batches across various platforms both online and offline. India has seen 4 restocks since September already.”New Love” also  attraction a lot of people.

Posted on

Nike Paul George PG2 Performance Review

The PG2 arrives sans strap,I feel like it was a simply shoes when the first look , because of the shoes is simply look like  a simply team shoes ,but not the style of Paul George.

Especial for during the ALL Stars , it is so simply look,just not like others shoes that released during this time.so it is surprised me that what kind of “SPECIAL”.

There are some sneakers , can you feel it ?

However when I playing it some days , it is amazing .

Here we are see the details as below :

 

For the material : it is also used the mesh material with suede upper.it ic comfortable.

Suede material distribution in the toe  and heel back , the suede can be  protect our fingers, while the suede in shoes around can enhance the overall  support and stability for the shoes 

The large area of mesh fabrics is also the main reason for  comfortable . The breathability of the mesh fabric is not bad, so it comfortable in the hot and moist whether. After all, I like this shoes very much.The forefoot is free feeling with the open mesh and it’s protected by a layer of fuse in the high wear areas.so that is the part that I like . This is great for players that stay on their toes and do not enjoy breaking in shoes. 

For the cushioning :PG2 followed the Zoom Air is what is offered in the PG1, that is great.This setup is for PG2 that want a more responsive ride for greater reaction speed. for the cushioning is  a little soft. You won’t sink into the cushion and you won’t feel it bounce back as you would if it were directly underfoot, but if you like the harder cushioning , maybe it is not cup of your tea for this one. For me, it gets the job done for the most part. 

For the lace system, it is also nice and amazing , the new lacy system can lockdown the feet well,also it is easy to adjust.

We can see the details as below : 

 

For the supporting, it is followed the PG1, the the shoe’s midsole sculpting that is doing most of the heavy lifting. This midsole cups your foot and it’s something I feel is very beneficial for players. it is a foolproof method that you feet and feetbad are on in one. If you try the PG 1,PG2 is similar with the Pg1, it is great for me .

For the traction :The Nike PG1 features an interesting pattern that will serve you well on-court. But the PG 2 also did the job weel such as followed the the version of the shoe features translucent rubber, and while it’s better than what Nike Basketball has put out in the past, It’s mostly to showcase the technology within the shoe for the Nike. If you are positive that the solid rubber options will far exceed this version on-court. Maybe it is not  you choice for this one.

There are the details :

Overall, though it is a simply look, but the performance is nice.Nike’s PG1 is a perfect blend of new and old.  But the PG2 is nice too.